CHARACTERIZATION OF ALPHA-GALACTOSYLCERAMIDE AS A MUCOSAL ADJUVANT

Adjuvants are essential components of vaccine formulations that enhance adaptive immune responses to antigens, particularly for immunizations targeting the tolerogenic mucosal tissues, which are more biologically relevant for protective immunity against pathogens transmitted by the mucosal routes. Adjuvants possess the inherent capacity to bridge innate and adaptive immune responses through activating innate immune mediators. Here evidence is presented in support of the effectiveness of a synthetic glycolipid, alpha-Galactosylceramide (-GalCer), as an adjuvant for mucosal immunization with peptide and protein antigens, by oral and intranasal routes, to prime antigen-specific immune responses in multiple systemic and mucosal compartments. The adjuvant activity of -GalCer delivered by the intranasal route was manifested in terms of potent activation of NKT cells, an important innate immunity mediator, along with the activation of dendritic cells (DC) which serve as the professional antigen-presenting cells. Data from this investigation provide the first evidence for mucosal delivery as an effective means to harness the adjuvant potential of α-GalCer for priming as well as boosting cellular immune responses to co-administered immunogens. Unlike systemic administration where a single dose of α-GalCer leads to anergy of responding NKT cells and thus hinders delivery of booster immunizations, we demonstrated that administration of multiple doses of α-GalCer by the intranasal route affords repeated activation of NKT cells and the induction of broad systemic and mucosal immunity. This is specifically advantageous, and may be even essential, for vaccination regimens against mucosal pathogens such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the human papillomavirus (HPV), where priming of durable protective immunity at the mucosal portals of pathogen entry would be highly desirable.

Development of a protective vaccine against Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori, which colonizes the stomach and causes the most common chronic infection in man, is associated with peptic ulceration, gastric carcinoma and gastric lymphoma. Studies in animals demonstrated that mucosal immunization could induce immune response against H. pylori and prevent H. pylori infection only if powerful mucosal adjuvants such as cholera toxin (CT) or heat-labile toxin of E. coli (LT) were used along with an H. pylori protein antigen. Adjuvants such as CT or LT cannot be used for humans because of their toxicity. Finding non-toxic alternative adjuvants/immunomodulators or immunization strategies that eliminates the use of adjuvants is critical for the development of efficacious human Helicobacter vaccines. We investigated whether several new adjuvants such as Muramyl Tripeptide Phosphatidylethonolamine (MTP-PE), QS21 (a Quil A derivative), Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) or heat shock proteins (HSP) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis could be feasible to develop a safe and effective mucosal vaccine against H. pylori using a murine model. C57/BL6 mice were immunized with liposomes incorporating each adjuvant along with urease, a major antigenic protein of H. pylori, to test their mucosal effectiveness. Since DNA vaccination eliminates both the use of adjuvants and antigens we also investigated whether immunization with plasmid DNA encoding urease could induce protective immunity to H. pylori infection in the same murine model. We found that oral vaccination with liposomal MTP-PE (6.7 m g) and urease, (100 m g) induced antigen-specific systemic and mucosal immune response and protected mice against H. pylori challenge when compared to control groups. Parenteral and mucosal immunizations with as little as 20 m g naked or formulated DNA encoding urease induced systemic and mucosal immune response against urease and partially protected mice against H. pylori infection. DNA vaccination provided long-lasting immunity and serum anti-urease IgG antibodies were elevated for up to 12 months. No toxicity was detected after immunizations with either liposomal MTP-PE and urease or plasmid DNA and both were well tolerated. We conclude that immunization liposomes containing MTP-PE and urease is a promising strategy deserving further investigation and may be considered for humans. DNA vaccination could be used to prime immune response prior to oral protein vaccination and may reduce the dose of protein and adjuvant needed to achieve protective immunity. ^

INDUCTION OF STRONGER AND LONG LASTING VACCINE IMMUNITY TO TUBERCULOSIS

Tuberculosis is a major cause of death due to an infection in mankind. BCG vaccine protects against childhood tuberculosis although, it fails to protect against adult tuberculosis. BCG vaccine localizes to immature phagosomes of macrophages, and avoids lysosomal fusion, which decreases peptide antigen production. Peptides are essential for macrophage-mediated priming of CD4 and CD8 T cells respectively through MHC-II and MHC-I pathways. Furthermore, BCG reduces the expression of MHC-II in macrophages of mice after infection, through Toll-like receptor-1/2 (TLR-1/2) mediated signaling. In my first aim, I hypothesized that BCG-induced reduction of MHC-II levels in macrophages can decrease CD4 T cell function, while activation of other surface Toll-like receptors (TLR) can enhance CD4 T cell function. An in vitro antigen presentation model was used where, TLR activated macrophages presented an epitope of Ag85B, a major immunogen of BCG to CD4 T cells, and T cell derived IL-2 was quantitated as a measure of antigen presentation. Macrophages with BCG were poor presenters of Ag85B while, TLR-7/9/5/4 and 1/2 activation led to an enhanced antigen presentation. Furthermore, TLR-7/9 activation was found to down-regulate the degradation of MHC-II through ubiquitin ligase MARCH1, and also stimulate MHC-II expression through activation of AP-1 and CREB transcription elements via p38 and ERK1/2 MAP kinases. I conclude from Aim-I studies that TLR-7/9 ligands can be used as more effective ‘adjuvants’ for BCG vaccine. In Aim-II, I evaluated the poor CD8 T cell function in BCG vaccinated mice thought to be due to a decreased leak of antigens into cytosol from immature phagosomes, which reduces the MHC-I mediated activation of CD8 T cells. I hypothesized that rapamycin co-treatment could boost CD8 T cell function since it was known to sort BCG vaccine into lysosomes increasing peptide generation, and it also enhanced the longevity of CD8 T cells. Since CD8 T cell function is a dynamic event better measurable in vivo, mice were given BCG vaccine with or without rapamycin injections and challenged with virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Organs were analysed for tetramer or surface marker stained CD8 T cells using flow cytometry, and bacterial counts of organisms for evaluation of BCG-induced protection. Co-administration of rapamycin with BCG significantly increased the numbers of CD8 T cells in mice which developed into both short living effector- SLEC type of CD8 T cells, and memory precursor effector-MPEC type of longer-living CD8 T cells. Increased levels of tetramer specific-CD8 T cells correlated with a better protection against tuberculosis in rapamycin-BCG group compared to BCG vaccinated mice. When rapamycin-BCG mice were rested and re-challenged with M.tuberculosis, MPECs underwent stronger recall expansion and protected better against re-infection than mice vaccinated with BCG alone. Since BCG induced immunity wanes with time in humans, we made two novel observations in this study that adjuvant activation of BCG vaccine and rapamycin co-treatment both lead to a stronger and longer vaccine-mediated immunity to tuberculosis.

The Influence of Immunization Route on the Adjuvant Effect of alpha-Galactosylceramide

Potent vaccine formulations ideally include adjuvants to activate innate immune responses and enhance antigen-specific adaptive immunity. The synthetic glycolipid alpha-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) effectively activates the innate immune mediating NKT cells to produce cytokines and activate downstream immune cells, resulting in development of humoral and cell mediated immune responses to co-administered antigens. While a single intravenous immunization of α-GalCer strongly activates NKT cells, multiple doses by this route are well documented to induce anergy in NKT cells. Anergy is defined as the deficiency in NKT proliferation and cytokine production, including IL-4 and IFNγ. However, our studies have shown that two doses of α-GalCer administered intranasally by the intranasal route leads to reactivation of NKT cells and improved adaptive immune responses after each subsequent dose. I therefore investigated the role of multiple routes of immunization in activation of NKT cells, i.e. anergy versus repeated activation. Specifically, I hypothesized that the differential capacity of NKT cells to produce IFNγ, as a result of route of immunization with α-GalCer, influences the induction of adaptive immune responses to co-administered antigen. Our experimental design utilizes the observation that intranasal immunization primarily induces immune responses in the lungs while intravenous immunization induces responses in the liver. Using intracellular cytokine staining for IFNγ production and Elispot analyses for determining NKT and T cell activation, respectively, it was determined that administering two consecutive intravenous doses resulted in anergy to NKT cells (no IFNγ production) in the liver and lack of adaptive immunity while second immunization by the intranasal route overcame anergy in the lung. The outcome in the other tissues analyzed was mixed and could be the result of tissue microenvironment among others possible reasons. When intranasal dosing preceded systemic, NKT cells were reactivated to produce IFNγ and induced positive adaptive immune responses in the responding lung tissue. These results indicate that the mechanism by which mucosal and systemic immunization routes activate NKT cells may differ in that there is a differential tissue-specific effect induced by each route. Future studies are necessary to determine the reason for these tissue-specific effects and how they relate to NKT cell activation.